Get the latest on climate action:

What is the Resilience Prioritization Quadrant?

This quadrant is a tool to help higher education institutions organize potential activities to increase resilience. It is modified from Stephen Covey’s time management matrix,1 and can help institutions decide what resilience initiatives to include in a new or updated Climate Action Plan (CAP). The quadrant will be most useful for schools that have generated a list of possible actions to increase resilience and need guidance prioritizing.

The quadrant frames potential activities or initiatives in terms of time sensitivity (more or less urgent), and magnitude of impact (more or less important). The upper left quadrant includes activities that are urgent and important; they address a pending climate crisis with large potential impact. Institutions should focus their CAP on implementing these steps. It is also important to include some actions that are less time sensitive but may have a large longer-term impact (upper right quadrant). The lower left quadrant includes short-term activities that have less impact. Institutions should consider incorporating these activities into the CAP if they will generate support and incrementally increase resilience.

More Urgent Less Urgent
More Important Focus:

Actions that address pending crises, time-sensitive issues with a large impact to campus and community.

Example: Action steps to address an imminent danger, such as a portion of the campus that is below sea level and floods with every major rain storm, or failing infrastructure that will not withstand the next storm or heat wave.

Manage:

Actions that address a long-term problem, or long-term prevention. This often includes partnership building.

Example: Action steps to build productive relationships with partners. Action steps to identify and secure future funding streams for projects that will improve longer term resilience or that will be implemented in the next 5-10 years.

Less Important Incorporate:

Easier, simple steps or tasks that may not be integral to achieving CAP goals but are important to the campus and community and help acquire community support. Easy wins. 

Example: A community engagement program that addresses a visible need in the community and generates stakeholder buy-in, such as a tree planting program.

Avoid:

Tasks that do not address a crisis, may be seen as busy work, and are not crucial to the CAP’s success.

Example: Activities that expend relational or political capital and contribute little value to the planning process, such as unnecessary meetings or compiling and recreating data sets that already exist.

Steps to follow in using the Quadrant

  1. List all possible action steps in one place. During the Resilience Assessment, campuses should have identified initial action steps to increase resilience based on their identified strengths, vulnerabilities, and initial indicators of resilience. Campuses that completed a Community Resilience Building workshop will also have a list of possible action steps to increase resilience.
  2. Identify the problem or type of problem each action step is addressing.
  3. Organize the action steps into each of the quadrant boxes.
  4. After organizing each step into a box, try to identify funding and implementation partners in order to ensure that each step can be actualized.

There will likely be a mix of urgent, not-urgent, important, and not important actions; this does not necessarily mean campuses must organize their CAPs this way. This tool is meant to help schools conceptualize and organize resilience action steps in order to more effectively address them, and determine where to allocate resources. A thorough CAP will likely include several actions from each quadrant except the bottom right (less important and less urgent).

Examples From City Plans

These examples are from city plans. Climate Programs Intern Valerie Weiner organized the examples to demonstrate steps that could fit into each of the quadrant boxes.

Important and Urgent

The CAP should focus on activities that are both urgent and important. These are activities that address an immediate crisis to the campus infrastructure or community at large.

Examples of Urgent and Important Action Steps (Focus) could include:

  1. New York City, NY:
  1. Los Angeles, CA:
  1. Philadelphia, PA;
  1. Atlanta, GA

Important and Less Urgent

Steps that are less immediate but critical to campus resilience should be managed over a longer-term. This may include the process of initiating relationships with new stakeholders that will be important for the implementation of more complex projects in the future. This may also include identifying funding streams that could support longer-term proactive adaptation initiatives.

Examples of longer-term actions with high importance or impact include:

  1. Boston, MA:
  1. Los Angeles, CA:
  1. Atlanta, GA
  1. Madison, WI

Urgent and Less Important

Institutions should consider incorporating short term action steps that may not address a pending crisis but contribute to increased resilience. These may be easier, simple steps that are important to the campus and community. Short-term wins can help generate support for longer-term and more complex components of the plan. This could also include activities or projects that have a lower impact individually, but together can incrementally increase the resilience of the campus-community.

Examples of short term and lower impact action steps could include:

  1. Cleveland, OH:
  1. Phoenix, AR:
  1. Philadelphia, PA
  1. Boulder, CO

Less Urgent and Less Important

There may be some action steps that have been identified, but should be avoided. These are generally activities that will not contribute significantly to achieving CAP goals, and may waste valuable political and social capital. This could include creating a poorly defined task force, conducting data analysis that already exists in a different department or organization, focusing energy on unpopular initiatives with low impact, or convening meetings that do not have a clear objective.  Campuses should carefully consider the cost and effort associated with potential action steps, and assess whether or not the outcome is sufficiently valuable to include in the CAP.

Thank you to Climate Programs Intern Valerie Weiner, Tufts University, Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning ’19 for helping develop this resource.

(1) Covey, S. 1989. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press, New York, NY

Stay Connected to Climate Action

Sign up for the Implementer, Second Nature’s monthly newsletter, for updates, network news, resources, and opportunities to engage in climate action across higher education.